Proposal “liquidity-provider“ (Completed)Back

Title:Liquidity Provider
Owner:eduffield
One-time payment: 127 DASH (29831 USD)
Completed payments: 1 totaling in 127 DASH (0 month remaining)
Payment start/end: / 2015-11-22 (added on 2015-09-25)
Final voting deadline: in passed
Votes: 828 Yes / 92 No / 0 Abstain
External information: dashtalk.org/threads/october-2015-budget-proposal.6234

Proposal description


Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
2 points,1 year ago
I voted YES and hope to be chosen as one of the 2-5 LP's - also UdjmiM6 created some kind of 'fix' to sway the crowd and Evan : https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/623
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
I was chosen but I cannot view the discussion on dt.org. I feel like I'm missing out on info.
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
They already chose people?? - I'm crushed :-(
I even got my name in within 10-20 minutes - ugh - guess I know where I stand around here...
Reply
1 point,1 year ago
We just chose random people to be fair. There were 20+ people that wanted the job :)
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
I just wanted one of the positions - due to MN keeps crashing - missed 3-4 payouts so far - don't really want to go 2-3 months with a crashed MN every 2-4 days.... just say'n - of which I did inform both you and Ghost of my request and situation.... again - just say'n...
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
I PM'd Evan about a minute after the BT post and luckily got in. If they went by response speed, it looks fair to me.
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
dont stress MangledBlue. I also got my name in early & missed out. Im sure there will be other opportunities.
Reply
1 point,1 year ago
So what is liquidity provider exactly? What do they do? Is this for exchanges or something? I am confused...?
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
No, they lauch a wallet and mix coin (darksend) 24h/24h.
This is to help improoving speed of anonymazing DASH.
Some said in dashtalk that they don't agree including UdjmiM6. Will try to find the thread later and post to you the discution.
I think that he convince me and this will be the only project this month to have my NO.
Reply
1 point,1 year ago
I'll vote yes. It's a temporary solution, but should speed up mixing. It should not compromise too much the anonymity. Livenet mixing is so slow, that's almost unuseable. Maybe, if there is some basal mixing going on, more people will do real mixing, because it works in reasonable time.

The whole mixing solution is not optimal. If there would be real use by thousands of users, we would suffer from large blockchain bloat. I hope Evan, will replace the coin mixing with a more sophisticated privacy solution in the future. Although i suppose, this new privacy solution will be more demanding than x11, instantx, masternodes & budget alltogether :)
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
UdjinM6 later changed his mind - an update to the code prevents Liquidity Providers from mixing with each other: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/623. This was the primary concern which seems to be resolved now
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
O.o
May be I will revise my mind... ;)
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
That's really great!
Reply
0 points,1 year ago
I voted yes after UdjinM6 made the necessary adjustment to have the Liquidity Providers proposal work without bloating the blockchain. After which Evan decided to go ahead with this proposal.
Reply