Welcome!

Voting YES, good job!

Thank you for the kind words!

Oh, so there are good proposals that you actually support, instead of maliciously attacking for no reason...

Fuck off!

Lysergic: gaslights and attacks "unaligned" proposals like all the Dash Latam proposals
Xkcd and pasta: DDOS masternode owners that they don't agree with
Joel: hogs funds in both DashBoost and the DAO, while refusing to be accountable for the funds
pmbf: refuses to answer my legitimate concerns regarding their proposal
Rango: spitefully deletes my proposal with no reason, no feedback, just censorship

I'm starting to get the feeling that you guys just *don't want me here*. But why? Why would you all who are supposed to be Dash members, be against the guy who has defended Dash for years?

Its becoming obvious that you are part of a "clique" who's goal is to CORNER THE MARKET on MNs so that YOU WILL CONTROL the network "behind the scenes" while pretending that all is normal.

In other words, you all have validated a post I made 7 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/dashpay/comments/ahasrv/the_final_and_strongest_weapon_against_us_will_be/

Conflict of interests is INDEED the weapon that bankers are using to takeover the Dash network and destroy our advantages so that we cannot compete with fiat and other coins.

Thank you for proving this for me.

Everyone knows, whenever lysergic has a bad day, he acts like a huge jerk.
But you behave like that all of the time !!

And don´t blame Rango for this.
Undermining the authority of the MNO isn´t a funny schoolboy prank, but rather a heinous crime.

You simply don´t have enough Masternodes for your voice having any weight.
Stop acting as if you own 5 or 10 or 20 this is ridiculous.

You are not a MNO and thus your comments here are a violation. You comment here even though you KNOW that this place is ONLY for MNOs to discuss our business without undue outside influence, which wreaked havoc here for years. You doing this is ironically proof that I am correct. Your attempts to troll me, to carry water for others that I engage with while allowing them to hide and pretend like they're "not going to respond to me" is a form of gaslighting and trolling which is completely inappropriate behavior.

Who is paying you to make these comments and attack me this way?

Also, I behave like this "all the time" because the enemies of Dash never cease attacking Dash. Defending Dash is a GOOD thing and if you really care about Dash you would THANK ME for my service. The fact that you attack me for it instead is also strong evidence that I am correct and that you are a bad actor, along with Lysergic.

Lysergic hiding behind "having a bad day" is completely inappropriate. I NEVER post this way because I'm "in a foul mood" or "trying to take my anger out on others". I ONLY post this way in order to get BAD ACTORS TO STOP BEHAVING BADLY.

I have been very successful at this, and yet you do not acknowledge or commend my efforts, which means you are likely aligned with the enemies of Dash. How do you respond?

I can blame whomever I see fit for this. Rango has responsibilities to the network as the administrator of this site. You are probably paid by him, or even are him himself, in order to "respond without responding".

You say that "undermining the authortity of the MNO ... is a rather heinous crime", apparently trying to mirror my language in calling DDOSing my masternode a federal crime, WHICH IT IS. It is NOT a crime to "undermine the authority of the MNOs" and anyway I have in no way done any such thing.

You are PROJECTING because YOU ARE NOT A MNO by your own admission and thus have no right to address me in this manner, in this place or even at all! This place is for MNOs to discuss our business, not for paid trolls to attack MNOs because you're BUTTHURT I called your cabal out for your dishonest and bad acting.

Also, you claiming "I don't have enough Masternodes for my voice to have any weight" is completely projection as YOU DON'T HAVE ANY MASTERNODE at all. One masternode is ALL IT TAKES to gain a voice in the network. And since I am undefeatable in argumentation, that means MY VOICE HAS THE MOST WEIGHT OF ALL in the network.

That's why you guys are trying to "force me out through trolling" because, despite your efforts to rig the votes, MY VOICE IS MUCH LOUDER and more effective than yours is, which means you lose power despite your attempts to manipulate things.

STOP POSTING HERE as you don't have a MN and its ridiculous for you to participate in this manner!

I hold an MNO vote, but I dont have a badge, because I dont want to reveal to the dashcentral admins which MNO I hold.

Well you should do what I did and verify your node then switch servers. It really is inappropriate for you to comment here without proving that you belong here. There's no other way to say it. Why would you want to make comments under the auspice of "maybe/might" being a troll?

Switch servers? Are you nuts?

And what if I verify my node, and then I sell my node?

Dashcentral admins should always check whether a masternode badge is still valid. But they do not, thats another reason why the whole masternodes badge system of dashcentral is flawed.

Thus I refuse to participate in it.

Yes, switch servers. Are you nuts? There's nothing "nuts" about that. If you verify you get the badge then you switch servers and you DC admins don't know which server is yours.

Its not complicated at all and accomplishes your desire. Are you lazy or what?

>And what if I verify my node, and then I sell my node?

You'll at least have proof that you WERE a MNO, which is better than the crap you're pulling now. Please try to pay attention. Someone who's NEVER had a MN can't do that.

DC admins don't check whether a node is valid because they've likely been captured by the cabal that I've pointed out definitely exists, so this is a way for you to prove that you belong here without exposing yourself to that cabal.

>Thus I refuse to participate in it.

Then you should refuse to comment here as well. Its really that simple and is not complicated.

The person who used to have an MNO, but sold it, is a traitor and should not be allowed to speak here.

The proposals compete eachother for the same budget.

So the proposal owners should be able to prove the flaws of other proposals, in order for their proposal to be voted.

Thats why proposal owners should be allowed to talk to all proposals.

I prefer listen to persons who never had an MNO, rather than persons who used to have an MNO but htey have not now. Because they are responsible for the failure of Dash.

Okay well that's just stupid. You are assuming that someone who switches servers "used to have a MN" which is the negative, i.e. you have to prove they sold before you can make this assumption. If you had a badge then you would at least prove that you at one time had a node, and if there's any question you could prove it again and again. People without a node DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE HERE AT ALL so you preferring to listen to them is you being a traitor. Careful.

I have no Dash, but I have an MNO vote (I am a delegate voter)

People without Dash should have no right to be here.

Not people without a masternode.

Thats my prespective.

True, but you can reverify your node and switch as many times as necessary to prove you're not a traitor. As it stands right now, you are WORSE than a traitor as have never proven that you have the right to be here.

So which is it? Are you a "delegate voter" or a "former proposal owner"?

You are clearly just trying to abuse the edge cases in order to "force MNOs to take disrespect" so that your comments and the negative results they have will be "our fault".

This is a form of trolling and indicates that you are a bad actor.

Proposal owners are only supposed to speak ON THEIR proposal, not on every other proposal. Why are you trying to justify your comments using clear 'flaws in the system'? Its not a design, its a design flaw, and you claim to be against the design flaws in the system, so you taking advantage of them to troll us is what's 'nonsense', here.

Stop being a bad actor.

The proposals compete eachother for the same budget.

So the proposal owners should be able to prove the flaws of other proposals, in order for their proposal to be voted.

Thats why proposal owners should be allowed to talk to all proposals.

I mean, by your own comment you should shut up then ("People without Dash should have no right to be here")

And no, the MNs decided years ago that non-MNOs shouldn't comment here. You are trying to subvert the will of the MNs by commenting here without verifying.

And its clear why, you don't have an actual MN, you're just a delegate voter. Again, you are on the fringe of what's acceptable here, and it explains why your comments are so destructive and trollish.

You should be banned from posting here.

That's my perspective.

I am talking here, because I am a former proposal owner.

That how I gain my talking rights.

Thats a desigh too, so stop telling nonsenses.

So which is it? Are you a "delegate voter" or a "former proposal owner"?

You are clearly just trying to abuse the edge cases in order to "force MNOs to take disrespect" so that your comments and the negative results they have will be "our fault".

This is a form of trolling and indicates that you are a bad actor.

Proposal owners are only supposed to speak ON THEIR proposal, not on every other proposal. Why are you trying to justify your comments using clear 'flaws in the system'? Its not a design, its a design flaw, and you claim to be against the design flaws in the system, so you taking advantage of them to troll us is what's 'nonsense', here.

Stop being a bad actor.

I am bot a delegate voter, a former proposal owner, and an active proposal owner.

Here is my latest proposal, still active.

https://www.dashcentral.org/p/encointerUBI-mean26

Also, this is clearly abusive behavior by you. You have a proposal that's active for 26 months, basically, according to you granting you commenting privileges for TWO YEARS on all proposals, just because you gamed the system this way.

Clearly that is not how this is supposed to work. You are attempting to troll the network by exploiting flaws in the governance system so that you can blame the negative consequences of YOUR ACTIONS on us.

These are power moves, they are deliberate, and they prove that you're being a bad actor.

The proposals compete eachother for the same budget.

So the proposal owners should be able to prove the flaws of other proposals, in order for their proposal to be voted.

Thats why proposal owners should be allowed to talk to all proposals.

Proposal owners are supposed to speak ON ALL proposals, because some proposals may be oposite to theirs, or they may want to prove that their proposal worths more to be funded, than the alternative proposal.

It doesn't matter. You're just making canned responses now. Competing for the same budget doesn't give one PO the right to comment on another proposal.

During the period I mentioned, people like George Donnelly were abusing this flaw in the design in order to troll and attack competing proposals. We MNOs determined that this was bad acting and requested Rango to make it stop.

That's the will of the MNs.

PO's should NOT be able to attack or "prove the flaws" of other proposals. This place is for MNOs ONLY to have those discussions. You are trying to subvert the will of the MNOs with your false reasoning.

Being a current proposal owner is not justification to speak on ALL proposals, ONLY ON your current proposal. Only MNOs are to have wide commenting privileges.

That's exactly WHY they should not be able to comment on other proposals and that is why we requested Rango to make it so proposal owners could only comment on their own proposal. It is a conflict of interest for opposite proposal owners to comment on the opposing proposal. You ignoring this is trolling.

Thank you for proving that you are an aggressive bad actor. Now take your own advice you paid loser.