Proposal “dash-vs-other-cryptos-marketing-campaign“ (Closed)Back
Title: | Dash vs. Other Cryptos Marketing Campaign |
Owner: | dashcrypto |
One-time payment: | 1083 DASH (41495 USD) |
Completed payments: | no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining) |
Payment start/end: | 2019-07-17 / 2019-08-15 (added on 2019-07-17) |
Final voting deadline: | in passed |
Votes: | 53 Yes / 514 No / 29 Abstain |
External information: | app.dashnexus.org/proposals/dash-vs-other-cryptos-marketing-campaign/overview |
Proposal description
Show full description ...
Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?
Submit comment
No comments so far?
Be the first to start the discussion! |
It is not enough to have a superior product (beta vs VHS). You also have to make sure everybody knows it exists and what advantages it offers.
So in my view, this proposal is a bargain - just think what exposure Dash can get and how much every MNO will benefit.
Why can't we ever have a smaller proposal for ads that proves it works and THEN asks for more?
MNOs of course like these ads because they're designed to appeal to MNOs. (Aren't we so smart to be hodling DASH!)
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/dashinformer
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/scale-internet-ads-dashinformer
During the course of this advertising campaign, the price of Dash fell substantially. Why is your ad campaign likely to be more successful at "protecting the price" than the one we previously tried? What is the success criteria for the advertising?
"Advertising budget will be used to advertise the videos exclusively and not dashcrypto.org" but the videos each prominently display dashcrypto.org at the end?
The videos, twitter campaign and bot look like they are high quality. But does spending on these kinds of ads directly correlate to increased price?