Proposal “dash-complementary-financial-services“ (Closed)Back

Title:Dash Complementary Financial Services
Owner:nikolaisaev
Monthly amount: 65 DASH (4649 USD)
Completed payments: no payments occurred yet (3 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2020-07-14 / 2020-10-12 (added on 2020-06-30)
Final voting deadline: in passed
Votes: 17 Yes / 362 No / 68 Abstain
External information: app.dashnexus.org/proposals/dash-complementary-financial-services/overview

Proposal description

click here to view proposal text

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
1 point,3 months ago
I read the paper and have no idea, what this is supposed to accomplish besides 3D modelling the Dash blockchain. And then I have no idea what a 3D model of a blockchain would even look like and what exactly the benefit of it would be. All I can tell is ... something, something, defi. Throwing lots of buzzwords around does not make this an attractive proposal.

Maybe you have something useful in mind. But it doesn't show in your proposal. I suggest before you try again, get some feedback, describe a clear benefit for the network, set clear deliverables with measurable milestones, provide examples or mockups of what you're going to build so people have an idea of what you're talking about, offer references if you can and most importantly, discuss your idea with the community beforehand, e.g. here: https://www.dash.org/forum/topic/budget-proposal-discussions.141/

For now, clear No. Sorry.
Reply
0 points,2 months ago
thanks for feedback! i believe that the crypto community would bad trip if i offered references. i tried to write it as simple as possible, the first financial service that is super simple and at the core of Dash would have been a POS ecosystem
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
Who hasn't registered 2000+ masternodes? :)
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
please vote!
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
please vote!
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
are you afraid of quantum?
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
please vote!
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
bump
Reply
-1 point,3 months ago
Correction: Without the 3D representations. This information would allow to find vulnerabilities in the security of a blockchain and therefore will not be disclosed. If you voted no after figuring this out on your own, please reply here, so that if the difference in votes is close enough at the end of the voting deadline i could remake a proposal for next cycle.
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
Is this a serious proposal?

You can't tl;dr the actual proposal part of your proposal without there being a long part! You should have labeled that section i;ottr= incomplete, only thing to read
Reply
0 points,3 months ago
Hahahaha
Reply