Proposal “crdev-development-201703“ (Completed)Back
Title: | Core Team - Admin (March) |
Owner: | babygiraffe |
One-time payment: | 966 DASH (22779 USD) |
Completed payments: | 1 totaling in 966 DASH (0 month remaining) |
Payment start/end: | 2017-02-18 / 2017-03-20 (added on 2017-02-24) |
Votes: | 609 Yes / 16 No / 0 Abstain |
Proposal description
This is a cross-post from the Dash Forum
This proposal funds all non-development core team contractors. The following functions are funded from this budget:
If you have any questions about this proposal, include @babygiraffe in the post so that I am sure to see your message.
Requested funding is as follows for the March 5th budget cycle:
Note: Should any funding remain, we will apply it toward future development expenses.
This proposal funds all non-development core team contractors. The following functions are funded from this budget:
- Finance
- Business Development
- Project Management
- Infrastructure Admin / Support
- Marketing / Communication (excluding international outreach / translators)
- Quality Assurance / Testing / Network Monitoring
- Legal (part-time)
If you have any questions about this proposal, include @babygiraffe in the post so that I am sure to see your message.
Requested funding is as follows for the March 5th budget cycle:
- 966.00 Dash for thirteen contractors ($22,720 USD @ $23.642 per Dash based on March 23rd average rate at https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/price-dash.html)
- 5.00 Dash proposal reimbursement
Note: Should any funding remain, we will apply it toward future development expenses.
Show full description ...
Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?
Submit comment
No comments so far?
Be the first to start the discussion! |
Finance
Business Development
Project Management
Infrastructure Admin / Support
Marketing / Communication (excluding international outreach / translators)
Quality Assurance / Testing / Network Monitoring
Legal (part-time)
...Is a hell of a lot of stuff to cover and I'm not sure I have 1 opinion on all of these points. Voting yes .. this time