Proposal “Unicorn-Rainbo-Ass“ (Closed)Back

Title:Unicorn Rainbo Ass (URA)
Owner:unicornrainboass
One-time payment: 69 DASH (2116 USD)
Completed payments: no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2016-09-04 / 2016-10-20 (added on 2016-07-24)
Final voting deadline: in passed
Votes: 49 Yes / 385 No / 0 Abstain
External information: www.dashwhale.org/p/Unicorn-Rainbo-Ass

Proposal description

https://dashninja.pl/budgetdetails.html?budgetid=Unicorn-Rainbo-Ass
Will Update when Dash Whale Updates my Proposal:

Intro


To make dash people feel great one of the important pieces of apple pie is a high quality data retention payments through gateways with instant rotten cherries. Bitpay and Coinbase have been instrumental in encouraging the insect colonies to add Bitcoin as an appetizer at Denny's, but we think it would be better if they add DASH because it taste much better.

Introducing Unicorn Rainbo Ass (URA). URA aims to provide high quality dessert toppings and conversion for insect colonies wanting to accept Dash. A short overview presentation is available here (presentation coming soon we are to lazy to do it right now).

Who are we?

We’re two brothers with one cup and a passion for driving adoption of anonymous and instant dessert toppings. We each bring different skills to the table with backgrounds in cake batter mixing, baking cookies, and many other stuff and things that we could go on and on about but who wants to hear about that? We split out time between New Zealand and Australia, currently we reside in Xanadu.

Amount requested vs. costs

We propose to request 69 DASH in a one time payment. This will provide us with capital to develop a beta version of our software and also help us hire a bunch of cake loving big people. Costs are very much an open ended question, but we believe URA is very important to the Dash ecosystems. We'll build as much as we can with the funds received, I mean it, you can really trust us. How could you not trust us we have a website, well soon we will. We expect to contribute additional funds from our own pockets on top of the DASH we hope to receive from the budget. We also believe 69 is a magical number that makes most geeky nerds horny so we figured if we pick that number we got a better shot of people voting yes.

Equity to Dash Foundation

As this is a for profit business we accept that we should give something back to the Dash community (in addition to building important infrastructure for mainstream Dash adoption). For every month of funding we receive we’ll be offing 5% of the business to the Dash foundation, and boy do we hope to have a shit tone of business.

Demo

We’ve built a demo site to so you can try out some early code. Visit unicornrainboass.xyz to give it a try (it's not up yet though, remember we are pretty lazy. For US $2 of Dash you’ll get two vinyl stickers posted anywhere in the world. At best we’ll probably break even on the sticker part, so even if you’re not going to vote yes on the proposal it would be great to if you’d buy some stickers (we may keep the sticker site going if there’s demand).

This is very early software so if you encounter any issues please send us a message atunicornrainboass@tutanota.com

Proposal submission
https://www.dashwhale.org/p/Unicorn-Rainbo-Ass

Want to join us?

We are open to having other individuals join us to help build Unicorn Rainbo Ass. If you have cake building experience, or just know your way around a kitchen and wanna fry up some good tasting shit, or even if you have skills or capital that you can offer, send us a PM with some info, especially if you have capital, remember you can trust us.

Want to vote for us?
Vote yes and we pormise to try our best to make sure there's a pot of dash at each end of every rainbo that we shoot out of our asses.

Note:
We have been long time community members but we wish to remain private. Demohttps://www.dash.org/forum/members/demo.5057/ can vogue for us. We are real, if you wanna know who we are ask him. There are a few other community members who can also vogue for us. We can let you know who they are if you wish.

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
1 point,7 years ago
Thanks for destroying 5 Dash, the submission fee.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
No problem. Thanks for seeing the bigger picture here. /s
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Good to see they should pay more cost to TROLL~
oh, btw: Even they troll, they still NEED Dash~ lol~
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
We are not trolling. We are simply doing what the network allows us to do. If you do not like our proposal please tell us what it is specifically you do not like. Also please see this post, https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/blog-post-on-dart-payments-dash-to-fiat-payment-processor-proposal-being-voted-off.8500/ because there is a point to this proposal and it's not trolling.
Reply
2 points,7 years ago
LOL 12 yes votes. I guess this is actually a good example. Do people not read the proposals?
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
No, they do not. Hence the reason this piece of shit proposal right here passed. https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/blog-post-on-dart-payments-dash-to-fiat-payment-processor-proposal-being-voted-off.8500/
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Although I would have liked to have heard back from those guys, the fact still is that the network stopped payment negating the contract. How you get a settlement from that, I don't know. There is no way in this case to 1.) demand an accounting for what we did give them, or 2.) demand that they finish the project. Anyway, You are right that we have to be more careful of who it is that is making a proposal. If it's a person giving their RL ID, then we have to verify that they are who they say they are. If it's an anonymous person with a long term profile, they should be able to verify who they are via some known fact, such as a wallet address. I was willing to gamble on them, as you know. Now that funds are getting tighter I'm also getting a bit more selective. Eventually, I'll want proposal budgets to go only to those highly qualified - with solid contracts regarding what will be delivered. But back then, I felt that it was important to give ideas a chance. Things are moving fast in this space, and yet we're still passing some proposals based on trust (mostly to the core team). I do see voters demanding more concrete proposals with well defined deliverables as time goes by though.
Reply
2 points,7 years ago
BTW - Interesting new way to troll. Very creative, but rather expensive for my taste. Hope it works for you??
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Not trolling. Works how? Like how a car engine works? Or works out in some positive way? Or our proposal passes?
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
If you voted 'Yes' for this, can you reply here with what points in the proposal convinced you?
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
The network does not require this.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
BTW I know you're jabbing us over the proposal we approved at one point, for fiat gateway - then the voters voted it down. Perhaps it was a proposal we shouldn't have trusted, perhaps we should have trusted it - in any case, it was Dash that broke the contract. The voters defunded it. After breaking their contract and pulling out, I don't know what the original proposers were expected to do? We couldn't demand funds back, they may have used them moving forward, we may have cost them more than they received, I don't know. In any case - I feel Dash voters have nothing to complain about. It was their move.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
No body in their right mind should have trusted that proposal. And yes that is the point of this proposal. The original proposal owners never intended on doing anything, and anybody that believes they did is blind as a bat.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
When I say it was their move, I mean the MN voters - Dash network.
Reply
1 point,7 years ago
This is a joke - right? Remove all the humour (which should not be here at all) and there is no substance left in this proposal. Also - it is 'vouch', not 'vogue'.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
It's actually vogue, demo will be vogue'ing in a photo for us. Nice try grammar nazi. Why not stick to the content of the proposal instead of trying to correct the words incorrectly.
Reply
-1 point,7 years ago
A rather expensive one, I'd say! But to each his own I guess ?!?
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
A tesla is expensive for some people, a tesla is not expensive for some people. Expensive is subjective.
Reply
1 point,7 years ago
I'd be surprised if someone won't ask for a rewrite of this proposal, with less topping.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Which topping would you prefer we remove?
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Where is presentation? Where is examples of your background in crepto-software development? Create a useful beta and it might be a ticket to take this investments.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
Did you not read the part about us being lazy? We wrote it twice in the writeup. Expect nothing, but trust us we will get it done.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
can we please have a rewrite of this proposal with less topping
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
We will not be rewriting anything, but we will make a promise to change it how the community wishes. Remember you guys can trust us so just take our word for it.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
and more funding please !! i recalculated your proposal and the costs are just too low. just tripple the costs and make it a 12 months payment.
Reply
0 points,7 years ago
If we need more funding we will just resubmit Unicorn Rainbo Ass Version 2.
Reply