Proposal “RECURRINGLY_BUY_COINMARKETCAP_BOOST_600X“ (Active)Back

Title:Recurringly buy CoinMarketCap Boost 600X package
Owner:MisterMAYHEM
One-time payment: 1001 DASH (46082 USD)
Completed payments: no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2025-11-06 / 2025-12-06 (added on 2025-10-25)
Final voting deadline: in 1 month
Votes: 37 Yes / 63 No / 36 Abstain
Will be funded: No. This proposal needs additional 367 Yes votes to become funded.
Manually vote on this proposal (DashCore - Tools - Debugconsole):
gobject vote-many 054f6523bfe841e6fa1da3565a9d9b47d2769d765cfffaa560344f1793168c74 funding yes

Please login or create a new DashCentral account for comfortable one button voting!

Proposal description

Notice: The recipient of the Payout of this proposal is DCG, meaning the Payout-Address of this proposal is the same as the Payout-Address of the multi-month DCG proposal.
This will allow Brian from DCG to use the funds accordingly and it ensures peace of mind, that the funds will be handled honestly with no possibility of embezzlement.


Howdy Folks !

To introduce myself, i am a Tadpole MNO following this project since nearly a decade already.
I will be forever grateful to Sam that he rescued the Evolution development when he took over
back in mid-2021. That we were able to even launch Evolution last summer, is mainly his merit.

But like many of you, in terms of price performance, i am disappointed and even a little bit angry
of where we are right now. Dash price is perhaps a slight uptick above the very bottom, but it is
still lingering in the dirt.
This means we are basically wasting our lives in excessive poverty with no end in sight.
I know, many of you still hope that one day, out of the blue, our price will shoot up a couple of
hundreds of dollars, like it did back in the spring of 2021. If you really believe this, you may as well
believe in the Easter bunny. The wake-up call says such an assumption has no grounds in reality.
Back in 2021 we were still in the TOP30 !
Now we are not even in the TOP100 any longer !!
This means we no longer have any focus or any meaningful attention from market participants.
And the faster we deal with this fact, the quicker we might be able to adjust and start to recover.

Dash with our treasury has had a HUGE advantage over Monero (XMR) for example and they lacking
a treasury have had a HUGE disadvantage. And yet Monero (XMR) is ten times bigger in market-cap
than Dash. Let that sink in for a moment. Something like this shouldn´t even be possible.
If we did very poorly, we should at least be the same size like they are. But nope. We are ten times tinier.

I will not resort to pointing fingers at anyone, because we are all guilty collectively of where we are right
now, including our very voting behaviour !!!!
But we also need to ask ourselves: Have we truly used our DAO to its full potential?
Did we really make the best use of our DAO so far? I don´t think so.

So what did we wrong?
It is a fallacy to believe any amount of technical gimmicks will bring Dash price up to $500 at the very least,
when we have seen time and time and time again, that this is simply not true. This is not how reality works.
Nobody asked for a lot of this technical stuff, nobody uses it and nobody even knows it exists or has any
desire to use it. I am 110% sure some of you will take GREAT OFFENSE from my words, taking revenge with
a knee-jerk reaction when voting on it.
Those kind of delusions and living in constant denial is what keeps the Dash price at the bottom forever.
We must stop believing that we have UNLIMITED TIME for whatever action has to be done.
Dash price could easily crash back down to $20 and probably will, if we fail to produce enough demand.
Providers or Services (in this case CoinMarketCap) could perhaps double their prices in a couple of months,
and it would be completely out of reach for us.

What will really affect Dash price?
THE LOUDEST YELLING OF ALL PROJECTS AMONG THE TARGET GROUP.

Goal of this proposal: Doubling Dash price to $80 - $100
If this proposal is being approved, it will authorize one-time 1,000 Dash for:


FIRST) Funding the CoinMarketCap Boost 600X package on behalf of the Dash project on ten days for a single
month (every third day) between NOVEMBER, 21st and DECEMBER, 21st and booking it always at UTC time 00:01
so that for each booking we will receive an entire 'calendar day'.


SECOND) Provided successfully testing it with the desired outcome:
Urge DCG to continue to request funding for it and to recurringly book it, including by increasing the frequency
to fifteen days per month (every second day) until we reach a Dash price of $500 and/or we reach the limit of its
power. After we reach such price level, it must not be taken away suddenly, lest price would come crashing down
immediately. Rather we would need to pay for it, for 12-18 months longer, every second day, for Dash price to
stabilize and then gently gear it down to every third day, every fourth day, every fifth day etc.
Funding it should receive TOP precedence and priority over funding anything else,
because of its likely HIGH IMPACT on Dash price, which itself determines the size of our DAO treasury,
and thereby the amount of resources we have available for funding everything else.
In order to guarantee its continuous funding, the MNO network grants express permission to DCG, to request
funding of UPTO 80% of the size of our Dash treasury, if DCG has explainable, valid reasons for doing so.
This is not meant as a recommendation let alone an encouragement, 80% of the budget is not what DCG must
or even should request, only what DCG can request if need be. An upper ceiling so to speak.



Booking the CoinMarketCap Boost 600X package only for a single day, may not give us any conclusive proof, and
could give us mixed results, causing only a slight increase of price, leaving us dumbfounded or in doubt, depending
on whether 1-2 other projects had booked the same package on the same day, which cannot be known in advance.
Of course, the maximum effect would be on such days, when we are the only project having it booked.

Why voting Yes on this proposal?
Dash has about 260K people on its CoinMarketCap watchlist counter,
meaning people who actively follow Dash price performance.
The amount of users on CoinMarketCap is about two orders of magnitude or a factor of 100 larger,
and not just that, it is indeed our TARGET GROUP: Crypto investors and Crypto traders.

Our collective funds will likely be put to good use to significantly improve Dash price.
The risk of not spending this kinda money on it, is much greater than the cost of booking it.
Otherwise our price could easily crash back down to $20 again.
However, if our price doubles because of this campaign, it will cost only half as many coins next month, and so on...

In fact the cost will be so low and affordable, that a price raise of only $6 because of it, will compensate the cost by
putting $40,000 additionally in our DAO treasury. A price raise of only $9 would already allow to increase frequency
to every second day (15 days per month), by putting $60,000 additionally into our DAO treasury.

Hope this makes sense, folks.
Thanks for the time reading.

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
3 points,1 day ago
Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) price are both at $330 while Dash price is below $50.

If nobody who is trusted to handle funds is willing to do it, we could still try to ask Pshenmic if he would be willing to volunteer to book it and resubmit it.
Every MNO who feels Pshenmic would be acceptable in this regard, please reply 'Yes' to this comment, otherwise reply 'No'.
Reply
1 point,1 day ago
Maybe just maybe Dash price is in a different cycle then Monero And Zcash and just needs a few more months before getting into a longterm bull market, leading to more Dash price jumps. See : https://imgur.com/my0yPpS
Reply
0 points,1 day ago
It´s called the suck-dick cycle.

Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) are also considered privacy-coins.
They have neither a DAO treasury to spend couple of hundreds of thousands of dollars each freakin month that is 100% of it on things which won´t move price up by a single lame penny.
How about trying for a single month to spend only 90% on such things?
Nor does Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) have a third of their supply withdrawn from circulation and locked in nodes.
Reply
1 point,1 day ago
So please explain why Zcash got dumped from ATH at pretty much the same percentage as Dash, when Zcash does not even have a DAO Treasury. Dash percentage from ATH : -97.2% Zcash percentage from ATH : -94.6%
Reply
1 point,1 day ago
I am calling it tunnel vision. It prevents certain people from seeing the bigger picture.
Reply
-2 points,1 day ago
Please explain why Dash cannot move past $50 while ZCash was able to seemlessly pump to 100, 200 and then $300. If you're going to demand an explanation for your question, you have to first provide one for that.
Reply
0 points,1 day ago
ATH means nothing, why do you refuse to simply watch market-cap which clearly shows the size of a project?

But i will explain it anyway:
When Zcash (ZEC) was launched, around $20M were trying to push hard into it, at the moment when only their genesis block existed.
This is why Zcash (ZEC) started trading with a price of like 5,000 BTC at the time of its launch, and therefore had a highly inflated ATH in its very beginning.
Reply
1 point,1 day ago
ATH is ATH. I don't care what explanation or assumption you try to impose on it. ATH is also about price performance, which is far more important to me then marketcap (which is nothing more then price x supply).

I could point to other Altcoins like Waves, IOTA, NEO, ALGO, Tezos, Polkadot and many many others who just like Dash got dumped more then 90% from ATH price and i could even point to Bitcoin Cash (-87% from ATH).

But that would be pointless, people with tunnel vision only see what they want to see and only hear what they want to hear.
Reply
0 points,1 day ago
If Brian didn´t kill this proposal right from the start, you and lysergic would have found another excuse to trash it.
Reply
1 point,1 day ago
Bullshit, this was DOA.
Reply
0 points,21 hours ago
Bullshit, Brian could have easily prevented this from happening.

I bet he thinks of himself being a Slavemaster to the Masternodes rather than an extremely well-paid SERVANT.
Reply
-2 points,1 day ago
Only because you are a dishonest actor who doesn't want to see any growth proposals outside of your corrupt Joel-circle jerk whom you likely receive kickbacks and orders from. You are corruption personified and the proof is how you ATTACK ANY ADOPTION proposals that aren't led by Joel valenz-fail-a.
Reply
0 points,21 hours ago
Piss off, you've already lost the moment you opened your mouth!
Reply
0 points,20 hours ago
Stop referring to yourself with your inane NON-RESPONSES, you projecting loser!
Reply
0 points,1 day ago
I believe $ZEC sends 20% of the block reward directly to the foundation, there is no DAO, no vote, it's a straight up tax. I also hear that they are using it extensively to buy influence in the space and launch ad campaigns like Brave ads and the like.
Reply
-1 point,1 day ago
You calling it a 'tax' is a Monero talking point. You all literally are Monero trolls infesting our DAO with their/your retarded bullshit, just so you can trick us into 'being more like them' so they can gain clout for being retards. You are a despicable 'person' and a terrible liar.
Reply
2 points,2 days ago
NO from me. The proposal is using DCG Payout Address and referring to Brian Foster, while the same Brian Foster foresee big regulation problems with this setup and does not want DCG involved. More then enough reason for me to vote NO on this budget proposal.
Reply
0 points,2 days ago
Same i wrote down there for Lysergic is valid for you as well.
If Splawik declines and you resubmit it, i will support you.
Reply
-2 points,2 days ago
Take note, a likely fellow corrupt member of the "joelsuckoff" team, who don't want to see any other adoption efforts than Joel's weak attempts simply because they're paid to vote that way. See also, lysergic, tantestefana and others.

When did the DAO elect Joel to be the ONLY PERSON to receive DAO funds???
Reply
0 points,2 days ago
Strawman/lies. Pshenmic (DFO) also receives funds, almost 1k Dash a month.
Reply
-2 points,1 day ago
Irrelevant/bullshit. Pshenimc isn't working on adoption efforts or growth efforts. Glad to see you *can* attempt to use logic and reason when it suits you, but that only further proves that you're being a dishonest bad actor when you refuse to, so thanks for that, genius.
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
I'm going to support this proposal if the payout address goes toward the Dash Growth and not DCG.
Reply
0 points,3 days ago
Judging from past voting behaviour, the MNO as a whole seemed to feel more confident with DCG.
But perhaps i am just dreaming it?
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
DCG already takes a BIG chunk of the DAO funds. It's wiser to spread them around and Dash Growth is made for purpose. This claim is a perfect fit. DCG has gone out from doing marketing requests. Also the actual result after less than 24h --> 36 Yes / 21 No / 21 Abstain --> does not give much hope.
Reply
-2 points,3 days ago
With a community like this, i never expected this proposal to get approved.
It was purely meant as an eye-opener to the minority who votes Yes.

And it will open their eyes indeed.
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
Before submitting a proposal, you can discuss your project on the forum or on discord.
With some feedback, you can adjust it and get more approval.
Reply
-2 points,3 days ago
How did that work out for your own proposals?
Reply
3 points,3 days ago
Very well. I got 52 Yes votes.
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
How's this proposal going to work out for you when all the NO votes come smashing in? Redo it proper and you get the votes.
Reply
1 point,2 days ago
Lysergic, i invite you to resubmit it. I´m serious and will change the title to 'downvote' thereafter.
You are known by most and will most likely receive the needed votes, if you volunteer to book it, in case Splawik declines.

But please keep the ask which is appropriate.
50 coins per month would only fund 0.5 purchases per month, which cannot even be booked.

A treasury worth $370,000 should be able to afford those $40,000 !
All i want is that we stop wasting precious time & opportunities.
No bad feelings whatsoever.
Reply
1 point,2 days ago
100% ^^
Reply
-2 points,2 days ago
Funnelling all adoption efforts into 'DashGrowth' is NOT proper. Proper would be having multiple teams working and competing against each other to grow Dash, not the corruption that you're paid to promote here.
Reply
3 points,2 days ago
I'm OK if the PO funds the proposal himself. Why using DCG or Joels addresses then? I trust only for the "security" of funds as the PO is new, even though is OG MNO. I'm all for it but as DCG does not want this funds to not have tax issues nor with centralization of funds from the DAO as DCG already take a big chunk of those then marketing related as Dash.Growth sounds good. I'm still for this proposal and I see some other MNOs too if the claim is lower, non collide with Pshenmic, DCG claims and if goes to a different payout address than DCGs.
Reply
1 point,2 days ago
I am fine with, will support and even encourage any known & trusted long-time member for re-submitting this using his own payout address, including you.
Everyone knows you (for example) are honest and trustworthy when handling funds.

However, the ask is appropriate to cover booking every third day for an entire month.

In case ravenor´s proposal doesn´t get approved, there will still be 319 coins left in this budget cycle for Pshenmic, which is about half the coins he claimed last cycle before Dash price doubled. Therefore it should suffice.

And even if Pshenmic had to skip a single budget cycle, he won´t die of starvation from it.
Reply
0 points,2 days ago
Okay, I understand that DCG doesn't want to take the fund for legitimate reasons, that's okay. This is what proposals are for, to find out whether there are any issues or show stoppers.

From my perspective, it seems the PO only wanted to choose something that everyone would agree would be immune to corruption, and if he funded the proposal to his own address, MNOs would vote NO because they assume he'd just steal the funds, or by a masternode with it.

But, that shouldn't be a problem. If the PO is legit then they just have to provide the address and KPI showing that they're spending it properly and we can view it. I just do NOT like the idea that 'an adoption proposal can only get passed if it goes through Joel'.

Like come guys, let's be real, 'DashGrowth' is inaptly named. We haven't seen any growth from DashGrowth for the years its been running, so why are people pretending like its some holy grail of adoption? We shouldn't be centralizing our efforts under one PO in the first place, its about DECENTRALIZATION and competition. Joel and co got rid of the competition, now every proposal has to go through him or else no vote?

That's not how its supposed to work. I hear your objections and I thank you for bringing those potential issues to the forefront, I only disagree that Joel should be involved in any capacity.
Reply
2 points,2 days ago
Yeah, DCG will surely be under harsh legal scrutiny, to the point it would wreck their bookkeeping.
Whoever wants to believe this NONSENSE may believe it. I don´t buy it.

Thank you for sharing your stance on this.
Reply
-1 point,2 days ago
Thank you for your proposal and I'm sorry that the MNOs are being obtuse in this regard.
Reply
4 points,4 days ago
This proposal should have gone to Dash.Growth. DCG is no longer a marketing company and will not manage this proposal as you wish. Regarding, Dash.Growth, this plan has already been discussed with Joel and he is investigating as a possible tool we can use to increase awareness of Dash on CMC. The amount requested is also too high, it probably should have been a multi-month proposal of about 50 Dash or so.
Reply
2 points,4 days ago
If a new proposal is made, I am happy to either receive the funds into the Dash Growth budget and execute, or the PO can receive them elsewhere and we can work together to launch the campaign when the time comes. Whatever works.

If a proposal for this purpose approaches the funding threshold, I can prioritize running a test campaign on CMC to make sure everything's ready to go.
Reply
-2 points,4 days ago
Like I mentioned before, centralizing our efforts with you is counter-productive and given your track-record, almost guaranteed to fail. You already have a 500 Dash a month proposal, and you've had that for the last year and more.

Yet the price of Dash has been languishing all the same, proving that whatever you're doing, its not effective. For the Dash you're getting, you should've ALREADY done something like you suggested, proving that you're not really even trying at this point.
Reply
0 points,4 days ago
Also with 50 coins per month, given the current Dash price and CoinMarketCap´s pricing we get NOWHERE.
You guys really need to stop believing we have all the time in the world. WE DON´T.
Dash price could crash back down to $20 anytime. CoinMarketCap could double prices in a couple of months.
We need to use the time and opportunities we have NOW, instead of constantly wasting them.
Reply
0 points,4 days ago
Thanks for pointing this out.
However, it has accepted similar tasks in the past, remember we once had a CMO (Fernando) at DCG.
Therefore it shouldn´t be an issue technically, at least i tought so.
Reply
-2 points,4 days ago
Centralizing our growth efforts with Joel, whom you are working with behind the scenes, is not a good idea as Joel's efforts over the years have shown to produce little to no results in price appreciation and adoption. I mean, Joel was getting, what 500 Dash a month for more than the last year, and the price was $20-25 over the entire time.

This proposal is about getting fast, rapid and verifiable results and Joel does not have a history of doing that, so relying on him and centralizing efforts like that is counter-productive and not in the best interests of the DAO.
Reply
-2 points,4 days ago
This is the first I am hearing of this. While I am not opposed to someone from the network trying this, DCG should not be involved to avoid any further perception of centralization per US regulations. I suggest to close this proposal and if the owner wants to continue to advocate for it, to find someone from the network that will accept the funding and do the proposed activities.
Reply
1 point,4 days ago
Brian, it was not meant to cause any trouble.
I didn´t want to bother DashGrowth with it, because i knew they are already very busy with a lot of other tasks.
However, the_desert_lynx wrote above he is offering his assistance in booking it on CoinMarketCap, if you are able to forward funds, in case the MNO approve it. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
Reply
-1 point,3 days ago
I am voting heavy NO.
Please re-submit the proposal, such that it pays out to the Dash.Growth address and is mindful to not overspend funds from DCG, Dash.Growth, and Pshenmic. 1000 Dash is too high, try for something more reasonable. I will vote YES on the re-submitted proposal, cheers.
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
Do it heavy yourself if you feel like.
Reply
0 points,4 days ago
I think you should keep going. Centralzing our efforts under one camp is not decentralization, goes against the principles of the DAO (multiple DFOs competing to get Dash the most growth and adoption) and in general is not an effective strategy. 'DashGrowth' as its so ironically named gets 500 Dash a month, so this proposal is just 2 months worth of that proposal, in a different direction.

I think its worth a shot, at least.
Reply
1 point,4 days ago
If DCG forwards the funds, DCG will of course assume responsibility that it will in fact be booked exactly as mandated by the MNO in case of approval.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter.
Reply
-1 point,4 days ago
Are you a MNO?
Reply
1 point,22 hours ago
It is just weird (and yes, frankly a bit dumb) that you would ask the CTF of Dash Core Group (Brian Foster) if he is a MNO. Looks like you can only fall back to that specific line, whenever you run out of arguments. It is a bit sad to observe really, it brings down the discussions quality on budget proposals.
Reply
1 point,21 hours ago
It is also sad to see your turn on DCG this way.
Reply
-1 point,20 hours ago
What's really sad to see is that you are deliberately being dishonest and seeking every chance you can get to attack me, simply for trying to uphold the rules and make this place better for MNOs to hold our discussions without trolling.
Reply
-1 point,20 hours ago
Um no its not.

1. I may not know who Brian Foster is, in which case such a question is appropriate

2. Even if I DO know who he is, just because he's 'the CTF of DCG' doesn't mean he runs a MN

3. What's weird is that YOU are not in support of questioning those without a MNO badge, which goes against your own best interests as a MN

4. It was a simple question, yes or no and its not your business to ansewr

5. I clearly did NOT run out of arguments as I made several since asking the question

6. What's sad to observe is the fact that you've been chomping at the bit ever since I exposed that you are a dishonest person (you called my arguments 'paranoia' despite having personally witnessed me defeat Dash's enemies with them), who is likely being paid to attack those who go against the grain

7. Who 'turned on DCG'? It was a simple question designed to make sure ALL COMMENTERS follow the rules

Are you certain that 'brian foster' has a MN? Are you certain that this user is ACTUALLY brian foster? If not, WHY ARE YOU so hellbent on making the REST OF US 'trust and obey'?
Reply
1 point,3 days ago
Are you a RETARD?
Reply
0 points,2 days ago
Are you talking to yourself?
Reply
1 point,2 days ago
He's talkin' to you, retard!
Reply
-2 points,1 day ago
You shouldn't speak for other people, dumbass!
Reply
-2 points,1 day ago
Correction *corrupt* dumbass!
Reply