Proposal “RAISE_BLOCK_REWARD_BY_ONE_THIRD_21M_MAX“ (Active)Back

Title:Raise Block Reward by One Third (21,000,000 Max Supply)
Owner:MakeDashGreatAgain
One-time payment: 1 DASH (53 USD)
Completed payments: no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2026-02-05 / 2026-03-07 (added on 2026-01-25)
Final voting deadline: in 1 month
Votes: 26 Yes / 170 No / 0 Abstain
Will be funded: No. This proposal needs additional 472 Yes votes to become funded.
Manually vote on this proposal (DashCore - Tools - Debugconsole):
gobject vote-many b9362745aad88aeaca600b2650882c0a9c7845ae70e7a2209589c79a83f11819 funding yes

Please login or create a new DashCentral account for comfortable one button voting!

Proposal description

Dear community of the Masternodes !

This decision proposal seeks to increase our Block Reward from currently around 1.77 Dash up to around 2.36 Dash,
without considering the Budget (or from currently around 2.213 Dash up to around 2.951 Dash including the Budget)
corresponding to an increase by One Third. It will neither change the 60-20-20 ratio among Masternodes, Miners and
Budget, nor will it shorten the multi-decade long timeframe until the last Dash will eventually be generated. Instead it
will increase Max Supply from 18,900,000 coins up to 21,000,000 coins (same as Bitcoin) exclusively.

Most of the additional inflation will NOT translate directly unto more selling pressure, as the principal beneficiaries of
this measure will be the MNO who rarely sell. Sam has also indicated that he intends to further diminish the selling
pressure originating from the Miners in his upcoming proposal the coming summer. Therefore inflation is a non-issue.

In case the community of the Masternodes gives their approval, this proposal shall take effect exactly when (or after)
the Dash Supply reaches 12,600,000 coins
around the time when this proposal is due.

The Math behind it:
At 12,600,000 coins there will be left exactly 6,300,000 coins until reaching the current Max Supply of 18,900,000 coins.
By raising those 6,300,000 coins to-be-mined by One Third to 8,400,000 it would translate to a new Max Supply of 21M.

If this proposal won't be approved, the Core Reward will shrink from around 0.83 Dash to around 0.77 Dash this summer.
The annual reduction — if not approved — by autumn of 2030 will cause the Core Reward to shrink down to 0.573 Dash.
However — if approved — the 0.83 Core Reward will increase to around 1.1066 Dash right after it takes effect !
EVO Rewards would likewise increase in proportion, extending to all future to come.

0.83 x 1.333333333333 (or /0.75 more precisely) = 1.1066

Of course, by improving Masternode profitability by 33.3% it will encourage Masternode investment while simultaneously
discouraging the shutting down of Masternodes by selling off Masternode collaterals in the marketplaces.

Thanks for your attention and the time required reading the proposal text.

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
1 point,1 day ago
disgrace
Reply
2 points,2 days ago
NO.
Reply
0 points,3 days ago
Dash will never change its total supply because Dash is sound money. Sorry, but we absolutely will never ever do this. Anybody who owns some Dash can know with complete certainty that the percentage they have of the total supply that will ever exist is guaranteed forever to NOT be changed. (Otherwise it would just be scam money.)
Reply
-1 point,3 days ago
Why would anyone care? Nothing is guaranteed, even Bitcoin can change its code.
Nearly two million Dash have been turbomined by the founders because of the mystery bug. And you don't sell your Dash?
Reply
2 points,3 days ago
> turbomined by the founders
No, by the miners (not all were founders).

> mystery bug
There was no mystery. Every detail had been well explained.

It seems to me, that you are spreading FUD.
And you still didn’t explain what problem you want to solve.
Reply
0 points,4 days ago
Is there any problem, that you want to solve?
Why 21M? Why not 22M, 25M or 30M?
Reply
-1 point,3 days ago
I am voting NO on this proposal, it doesn't solve a problem that we have. I can see a time in the distant future where we move toward a perpetual tail emission, this would solve the problem of the DAO running dry and masternodes/miners not getting enough subsidy, but that future is beyond our natural lifetimes, so I am not worried about it at all.
Reply