Proposal “Increase-ROI-Reduce-Treasury“ (Closed)Back

Title:Increase MN ROI, Return Treasury to 10%
Owner:forro68
One-time payment: 0 DASH (1 USD)
Completed payments: no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2025-11-07 / 2025-12-06 (added on 2025-11-21)
Final voting deadline: in 9 days
Votes: 30 Yes / 56 No / 0 Abstain
External information: dashcentral.org/p/Increase-ROI-Reduce-Treasury

Proposal description

At the beginning of the Dash Treasury it was set to 10% of mined Dash.

Historically, the majority of funds spent through the treasury did nothing to help Dash over the long term. It was given out with little to no accountability, wasted, with no results except to raise selling pressure and push down the price, hurting the project's price and trust, causing people to move away from Dash.

In desperation, a few years ago, it was mistakenly increased to 20%, which only worsened the problem.

Now we are beginning to rise, but we still run the risk of the same problem pushing the price down again over the long term. It's time to return the Treasury to 10% and allocate the other 10% to MNs.

This will increase the MN allocation from 60% to 70% of mined dash, an increase of 16.67%, making it a much more attractive investment. Many more people will invest in MNs, locking up much more dash in MNs, greatly increasing the scarcity of dash in circulation, causing the price to rise significantly. All holders will be rewarded with a rising price, and more people will choose to hold dash and to save in dash.

By reducing the Treasury's percentage, it will actually get more in USD every month. We would be very wise to make this change.

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
 
0 points,5 days ago
I propose:
Return Treasury to 10%
Increase miner payouts by +10%
Reply
2 points,5 days ago
Why do we need more mining?
Reply
2 points,13 days ago
Hello forro68,

I am wondering where did you create this proposal? From https://mnowatch.org/leaderboard/?20251125225004 I can see your proposal is actually expired, despite you making it this month after the November cycle ended. Was it your intention to have the proposal expire before the Superblock thus making it invalid? If not and you believe this to be an error in whatever generator you used, I suggest you report it.

I checked thoroughly the logs of https://mnowatch.org/proposal-generator/ and I can not see you using the site, which is a damn shame, as had you used it, you would have had a valid proposal. Do let us know, I am intrigued how you managed to submit a proposal that dies in the ass before the cycle is even over. Cheers!
Reply
4 points,16 days ago
While paying more to the Masternodes would make Dash a more attractive investment. I believe we get more value from what we can build on Dash through the DAO, and thus, I am voting NO to keep things as they are.
Reply
3 points,16 days ago
"the majority of funds spent through the treasury did nothing to help Dash"
This seems to be FUD, doesn’t it?
Reply
3 points,16 days ago
Furthermore, IMHO, this is quite insulting.
It means: "MNOs, you don’t know how to vote!"
Reply
-3 points,17 days ago
Expect to see a couple hundred No votes on this, by the corrupt group who wants to keep taking from the treasury.
Reply