Welcome!

To those who have or are considering voting against my proposal:
Do you not want Dash to function as a safe store of value?
Do you not want to make dash a better investment?
Do you not want to the price to break it's long term downtrend?

Shifting 10% from the treasury to the masternodes will result in another ~580,000 dash being locked up as masternode collateral and greatly reduce monthly selling pressure. The price and ranking will rise. It will be safe to hold dash. The market will see it and adoption will increase. This is the best possible marketing.

We will be able to show the world that Dash is the world's best store of value, the world's best means of exchange, and that masternodes are the world's best investment.

As the price rises, event the Treasury will have far more in USD than it does now. Everyone involved wins.

Instead of abstaining or voting no, really think about this and vote yes! We have the power to make this happen!

Here we are again, under $30. It does not need to be this way. We can use this one simple adjustment to stop the slide, reverse it, and let the rising price bring us the attention we deserve and the adoption the world needs.
Even the treasury will benefit.
Vote yes.

Encouraging more Masternodes is our way out of the long-term decline. The pump completed and now we resume our long-term slide downward, along with the little remaining trust in the project. Nobody wants to hold something that cannot hold it's value.

The treasury is an inherently weak hand that dumps dash every month and suppresses the price.

Masternodes are inherently strong hands that lock up millions of dash.

It is a mathematically guaranteed outcome that if we shift more dash from the treasury to masternodes, selling pressure would be reduced. More dash would be locked up in new masternodes. The price would go up and stay up. The treasury would actually get more in USD every month than it does now. Trust would be restored. Users would return and hold.

Vote yes!

Your logic is false, look at Zcash, the core team quit (20% of block reward) and the price is in free-fall.

The logic is sound and true. As for zcash, when the core team quits, trust is lost.
Now look at all the top coins. Do they have a treasury at all? No.

Our treasury can be helpful if it's not too big. Currently it is harmful because it takes too much dash.

We can expect the long term decline to continue unless we adjust the tokenomics. If dash rose to $500, at 10% the treasury would receive $3.6 MILLION every month, rather than the $367,000 currently.

I much rather have the extra money in Treasury.

We would have much more money in the treasury if we made the adjustment.

Voting NO, the split for the time being seems optimal, 20% to miners, 20% to the DAO, 60% to the Masternodes. An evonode currently earns about 9.2% on their staked Dash and a regular masternode earns about 6.6%.

It is clearly not optimal. My adjustment would optimize it.

So you think, that high hashrate is more important than the DAO?

Focus on the proposal currently in front of you and process the math.

Stop spending proposal fees!

Vote the numbers!!!!

You have the tool, use it!!!

https://mnowatch.org/votethenumbers/