Welcome!

Hello,

Once again, I come before the network with a proposal. I'm reposting this proposal because the last one was unfairly deleted before the voting deadline in an act of censorship, likely by Rango himself.

This proposal seeks to put an end to the near endless cycle of "reward adjustment" proposals that have recently been cropping up. Decision proposals were not meant to be used this way. They were designed as a last resort. The enemies of Dash seek to use TROLLING in order to gaslight us into self-destructive behavior.

I argued, successfully, seven years ago that conflict of interest would be the greatest and strongest weapon used against Dash by our enemies. You can see this now, but I will provide some examples:

1. HenryGeorgist, who was/is a masternode owner, attacked Dash's proposals in LaTam and other places, while also commenting on youtube and reddit in favor of Monero and against Dash
   
   
2. Joel Valenzuela (or Valenz-fail-a as I like to call him, since he's never provided any positive ROI or adoption for Dash that I'm aware of despite earning masternodes worth of Dash in proposals over the years), cynically and selfishly hogged DashBoost funds even while he had a proposal active siphoning hundreds of Dash from the DAO. This was an egregious form of corruption and a conflict of interest
   
   
3. Lysergic, also attacked Dash LaTAm proposals, despite them provably giving Dash the largest growth we've ever witnessed, with 150,000 (!) active users of the Dash wallet in Venezuela alone, thousands in Colombia and Brazil, 4000 in Jamaica (more than the 3000 in the U.S.) and other regions. Despite this, Lysergic, pretending to be a "codgy old man with bad eyesight" relentlessly attacked these proposals and constantly bickered with their POs until they were gone, along with a cabal of others, including Joel, agnewpickens and others. This despite them showing "favorable votes" towards "their friend, some guy named Tommy with a strip club" or some such nonsense. Clearly a conflict of interest
   
   
4. Currently Rango pretends to be unavailable, but I'm 99% sure he is using Tekken as a sockpuppet account, as well as itsdemo either as a sockpuppet or a "vote delegate". This is so he can pull off the "aloof admin attack" which is an attack where a website administrator pretends to be "too busy or otherwise unavailable" to protect themselves from feedback while "stlll responding using sockpuppets". This is an egregious act of deception and a breach of network trust. The reason he engages in this is likely the cabal that I always mention is paid by outside forces to corrupt and disrupt our governance so that Dash stops being so dominant relative to other coins
   
   
5. In violation of federal law, Xkcd, Rango and Pasta (core developer), are guilty of DDOSing/attempting to DDOS my masternode. It is a FEDERAL CRIME to engage in or participate in DDOS attacks. Here, in this Dash forum post, you can see Xkcd attempting to get me to "prove I have a MN" again, likely so that he can get my IP and conduct a DDOS attack. Pasta also did the same thing in the Discord. The Monero community also did the same thing, when they DDOS'ed the Qubic pool, indicating that xkcd and Pasta have been paid to work with Monero (they use the same, illegal tactics, and RobbyDash, a MNO, recently argued that it wasn't Rango but the Monero community that DDOS'ed my masternode, indicating that they are in fact the same group)

There is more but I don't want to bore you with details you already know. The long and short of is simply that Dash is constantly under attack from people with conflicted interests and we have to deal with them. These are the same tactics that Israel used against Hezbollah and Iran, where they infiltrate key positions by bribing, coercing or otherwise compromising prominent individuals in order to sabotage growth and prevent retaliation. That is likely why, lysergic, Tekken and 'CouncilOfChimpanzee' are so aggressively against my previous proposal, calling it a "crime" and falsely claiming that I was trying to "restrict the MNO´s freedom to vote." 

Neither this proposal nor the one before it sought to restrict MNOs freedom to vote, that is a cynical misrepresentation of the proposal. This proposal and the one before both seek (sought) to RESTRICT NON-MNOs/NON-DCG members 'right' to post decision proposals! Decision proposals are NOT something that we should be voting on every month! This is a form of gaslighting where trolls go "Oh, so you think you're better than us because you have governance huh?! Well, we'll just see about that! We're going to TROLL YOU AND TROLL YOU UNTIL WE DESTROY YOUR COIN! Hahahaha, looks like your stupid governance doesn't work after all!!" That's all they're doing. They're trying to use bought and paid for LIARS to manipulate votes and prevent Dash from winning the crypto competition. And they're CHEATING to do it.

As MNOs, we have a FIDUCIARY DUTY to prevent this from happening. This proposal does not restrict MNOs voting power, it merely is a consensus vote that MNOs DO NOT WANT ANY MORE decision proposals unless they're absolutely necessary. Changing the block reward, removing proof of work (like Joel Valenzuela said he's "considering doing" on twitter) these things are NOT beneficial to the network and there is NO emergent cause or justification for putting them to a vote.

There is a PROCEDURE that must be followed before decision proposals can be justifiably brought to a vote. There must BE A NEED for the vote. Voting to "remove masternodes" for example would be completely inappropriate. Just like voting to once again change the reward split is.

Please join me in securing the network by voting YES! for this proposal so that we can send the message that decision proposals are ONLY MEANT FOR EMERGENCIES and are not meant as a constant tool to needle the network into irrelevancy.

Thank you for your time!