
Proposal “DashTownHall“ (Closed)Back
Title: | Dash Town Hall - Dec 2022 |
Owner: | DashTownHallAdmin |
One-time payment: | 1 DASH (24 USD) |
Completed payments: | no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining) |
Payment start/end: | 2022-12-11 / 2023-01-09 (added on 2022-11-30) |
Votes: | 479 Yes / 82 No / 20 Abstain |
External information: | dashtownhall.com |
Proposal description
Dash town hall is a governance site similar to Dash central or nexus. The site offers Request for proposals, public voting and eventually delegates. We will also be making some efforts to co-ordinate the various discussion platforms (Dash central, forum, Reddit etc...)
The major advantages the site currently offers:
Roadmap / Planned features:
The major advantages the site currently offers:
- Simple Leaderboard - Proposal overview
- Request for proposal functionality (Using the draft proposal system)
- Public vote to express community opinion on both active and draft proposals
- Vote Delegation Guide
- Public votes displayed in a way to allow direct comparison with MNO votes
- Building a meritocracy where dash users discuss, vote, contribute or simply audit any and all aspects of the Dash treasury system
- Improving the treasury system where proposal concepts and requests for proposals can be evaluated by the community without financial commitment from either Proposal owners or the treasury
- Increasing trust and community involvement by making the site multi-lingual
- Setting the standard for transparency
Roadmap / Planned features:
- Historical records of each proposal cycle
- Historical MNO vote counts
- Historical records organized by proposal owner
- Historical Public vote counts
- Forum/Discussion platform
- Vote prioritized comments
- Tagging system where you could see "top concerns" and "top benefits" that could be created and voted on, and also filter comments by the same tags, items such as "insufficient transparency", or "reputable team",...etc
- The 'reputable team' and 'insufficient transparency' would probably be a 'sticky' at the top of the discussion right? That way you could see them grouped as in 23 people say they need more transparency…
- Import comments from other platforms (DC/Reddit/etc)
- Notifications of voting deadline, proposal status changes etc.
- Proposal Status change notifications
- Masternode monitoring tool including notifications
- Masternode Status change notifications
- Delegates Voting History
- Proposal Owner Accounting / Fund tracking
- Masternode Best practices
- Transparency guide for proposal owners
- Bounties tied to requests for proposals
- including mobile voting
Show full description ...
Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?
Submit comment
![]() |
No comments so far?
Be the first to start the discussion! |
Here's a quick demo of the site. I'm not happy with the quality of the video so I'll replace it at some point.
There is also dashtalk.org, dashninja.pl, reddit and several open or closed membership discord channels.
I think the Dash community suffers from decentralization of information.
Not having a single point where all the dash member can communicate eachother causes misinformation and misunderstanding.
It is a chicken-egg problem.
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/927:_Standards
One of my biggest pet peeves is people who try to re-invent the wheel. I wouldn't be making these efforts if I didn't feel like there are massive improvements to be made. I'll add some of those to the description of this proposal (so that they're not lost in the discussion).
Also your repeated mentions of moderation annoys me.
It was moderation of the Dash subreddit by Basilpop that completely DESTROYED the Dash community.
Moderators need to kill themselves.
There is also a budget request history of Dash Town Hall, where one of the budget proposals was funded and one not.
See : https://imgur.com/v1KWvRP
Last year I was attempting to launch the website with a couple of paid moderators. I was assuming that the community would welcome a nexus replacement. There was so much discussion about the funding that this year I've decided to completely remove that issue until we know what the community wants.
As you highlighted... the community approved one proposal and denied the next. As a proposal owner, this can be pretty confusing and discouraging. It's difficult, and maybe impossible to really get a genuine message from yes no votes, and this is why I'm not requesting any funds over the cost of the proposal fee this time. The purpose of this proposal is to ask the network if this project is something they want....yes or no. If the MNO's decide that this project might have merit, and if the votes are clear I'll start funding an app which will accomplish the same features (and more).
If you have any questions whatsoever about this project please direct them here. There is an old forum post for this project which I'll also check, but likely not as often. You can also reach me directly at Help@dashtownhall.com
Do not focus on your personal site, but rather on what you think the community would like to see built.
By proposing generic governance questions you welcome developer's competition, and thus your governance proposal has more chances to pass.