Proposal “DIF_Supervisor_Election_2023_Rodrigo“ (Closed)Back
| Title: | DIF Supervisor Election 2023 Vote For Rodrigo |
| Owner: | TheDIF |
| One-time payment: | 2 DASH (59 USD) |
| Completed payments: | no payments occurred yet (1 month remaining) |
| Payment start/end: | 2023-02-08 / 2023-03-21 (added on 2023-02-08) |
| Final voting deadline: | in passed |
| Votes: | 322 Yes / 71 No / 6 Abstain |
Proposal description
Full name:
Rodrigo Ambrissi
Social media handles:
Discord: @Rodrix Digital
Telegram: @RodrixDigital
Long-term Dash community member since 2017, responsible for the Management of Dash Brazil Community, Responsible for implementing a fund's investment strategy managing and onboarding new projects to the DIF Like. 88i, Bitfy, Edge Wallet, C2Law, and hosting the DIF podcast and social media.
More questions to Rodrigo?
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/dif-election-2023-candidate-q-a-thread.53524/
Apparently people who are neither MNOs nor proposal owners cannot comment on proposals here. Since we can't assume that every candidate is an MNO, please use the Dash Forum at the link above for more feedback.
General Election Info
As announced in our recent blog post, we are asking for community input on four candidates for DIF supervisor:
The DIF normally has six supervisors, who are elected for one or two-year terms as explained in our post here. Of the supervisors originally elected to two-year terms, Darren and Glenn chose not to extend for another year and resigned in 2022. That leaves five seats available, for which we have only four candidates.
That means at least one seat, perhaps more, will remain unfilled. This is unfortunate, but also not a showstopper for the DIF. We are legally able to fully function with fewer than six supervisors.
So we're asking the community to carefully consider the four candidates based on their merit, not on the need to fill slots. Please vote YES or NO. Any candidate with more Yes than No votes will become supervisor, candidates with a negative balance or a tie will not. The 10% threshold for funding proposals does not apply to confirming candidates. ABSTAIN votes have no effect on the tally, they're essentially wasted.
The payout address used for this proposal is the regular DIF budget address as can be confirmed in any block explorer. We are asking for 2 Dash in each election proposal in the hope that the reimbursement from candidates with enough Yes votes will cover the proposal fee for candidates with insufficient Yes votes. Should the election end up with a net funding surplus, the DIF will retain it in its general budget. Likewise, should the election not generate enough funding for fee reimbursements, the DIF will cover the expense, so no candidate has any personal financial benefit or loss from the election.
Rodrigo Ambrissi
Social media handles:
Discord: @Rodrix Digital
Telegram: @RodrixDigital
Long-term Dash community member since 2017, responsible for the Management of Dash Brazil Community, Responsible for implementing a fund's investment strategy managing and onboarding new projects to the DIF Like. 88i, Bitfy, Edge Wallet, C2Law, and hosting the DIF podcast and social media.
More questions to Rodrigo?
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/dif-election-2023-candidate-q-a-thread.53524/
Apparently people who are neither MNOs nor proposal owners cannot comment on proposals here. Since we can't assume that every candidate is an MNO, please use the Dash Forum at the link above for more feedback.
General Election Info
As announced in our recent blog post, we are asking for community input on four candidates for DIF supervisor:
| Jared | new candidate |
| Justin | new candidate |
| Rodrigo | current supervisor up for re-election |
| Sven | current supervisor up for re-election |
The DIF normally has six supervisors, who are elected for one or two-year terms as explained in our post here. Of the supervisors originally elected to two-year terms, Darren and Glenn chose not to extend for another year and resigned in 2022. That leaves five seats available, for which we have only four candidates.
That means at least one seat, perhaps more, will remain unfilled. This is unfortunate, but also not a showstopper for the DIF. We are legally able to fully function with fewer than six supervisors.
So we're asking the community to carefully consider the four candidates based on their merit, not on the need to fill slots. Please vote YES or NO. Any candidate with more Yes than No votes will become supervisor, candidates with a negative balance or a tie will not. The 10% threshold for funding proposals does not apply to confirming candidates. ABSTAIN votes have no effect on the tally, they're essentially wasted.
The payout address used for this proposal is the regular DIF budget address as can be confirmed in any block explorer. We are asking for 2 Dash in each election proposal in the hope that the reimbursement from candidates with enough Yes votes will cover the proposal fee for candidates with insufficient Yes votes. Should the election end up with a net funding surplus, the DIF will retain it in its general budget. Likewise, should the election not generate enough funding for fee reimbursements, the DIF will cover the expense, so no candidate has any personal financial benefit or loss from the election.
Show full description ...
Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?
Submit comment
|
No comments so far?
Be the first to start the discussion! |
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/dif-election-2023-candidate-q-a-thread.53524/
Apparently people who are neither MNOs nor proposal owners cannot comment on proposals here. Since we can't assume that every candidate is an MNO, please use the Dash Forum at the link above for more feedback.
I am not sure if this applies to the DIF or to the DTP, but i seem to recall a verification process for candidates that is pretty extensive, lenghty and candidates will need to provide a lot of personal information / let go of their privacy. I vaguely remember a candidate even reconsidering his/her candidacy , when that candidate became fully fully aware of the information they needed to diverge.
As i mentioned before, i can't remember clearly if that applies to the DIF election or to the DTP election. Can you provide some clarity on this and are all the new candidates fully aware of this and won't back out of their elected candidacy afterwards ?