Proposal “CrowdNode-sep2022-nov2022“ (Completed)Back

Monthly amount: 290 DASH (8393 USD)
Completed payments: 3 totaling in 870 DASH (0 month remaining)
Payment start/end: 2022-08-12 / 2022-11-09 (added on 2022-08-16)
Votes: 761 Yes / 44 No / 46 Abstain
External information:

Proposal description

Hello all,

New and last proposal in accordance with our agreement with DIF.
We are asking for 15.000€ as agreed with DIF. For each month, DIF will get 1% more equity stake in CrowdNode. We are currently at 9%, and this proposal takes the equity stake to 12%.

-Today; Tuesday the 16th of August - beta of Trustless Staking is live on Testnet :-) A huge milestone. We appriciate your help to test it, provide feedback and get this Mainnet ready as soon as possible.
-Friday the 19th of August - Release of video, giving a status on our Roadmap, sharing Stats since we launced the Blockchain API and the following integration into Dash Mobile Wallet, and ofc. a short demo of trustless.
-- Watch the video here:
-During the next couple of weeks we will update our knowledge base and release tutorial videos regarding Trustless Staking.

Thank you for your amazing support so far and hang on for more info.

Kind regards,
The CrowdNode Team

Show full description ...

Discussion: Should we fund this proposal?

Submit comment
5 points,1 year ago
Easy "yes" for me. Crowdnode is one of the most valuable tools available to us as the Dash community. It provides the ability to:
1. Easily get new people interested in Dash for the high return with relatively low risk
2. Earn interest
3. Get in an out easily on sub-1000 Dash amounts
4. Increase the percentage of Dash in MNs
3 points,1 year ago
You've got my vote. CN is finally bringing trustless shares that the community has been begging for since 2016.
7 points,1 year ago
Why do you put up this proposal after DCG already posted their supplemental funds proposal which would not have left any funds in this cycle? Are you an idiot?
Act earlier or fucking wait till the next budget cycle, with your totally exaggerated ask.
You reckless punk.
-2 points,1 year ago
Don't be an ass. I heard DCG and Crowdnode submitted their proposals at nearly the same time, so it probably was just a timing issue. This is nothing to get your panties in wad about.
0 points,1 year ago
CrowdNode should have put up the proposal two weeks earlier or else waited till the next budget cycle,
and not submitting a proposal for which no funds would be left, provided the passing of the supplemental funds proposal.

Glenn with his kneejerk reaction of replacing the supplemental funds proposal took this stupid decision knowing full well that many MNOs had already voted and are not guaranteed to come back to vote again because of this nonsense.
With voting at all time lows we now risk having the supplemental funds proposal not approved at all.
7 points,1 year ago
Dear Companero,
We should have put up the proposal earlier - that is a fair point.
The proposal is put up as agreed in the written agreement with DIF, which we have been very open about from the start.
Only pointing a finger at our selves here, we should have reminded Glenn/DCG that our proposal was on the way.
We have been busy building Trustless, and we have a lot to show, which makes it better than an empty proposal with nothing to show.
We think that it is best for the DAO to get a higher equity share in CrowdNode (plus allowing us to continue evolving the platform) and that DCG also gets supplemental funding.
Please motivate a positive voting cycle so everything succeeds - 7 days should be time enough to get enough FOR-votes on both proposals if we don't split more hairs.
5 points,1 year ago
I am a fan of Crowdnode, I've seen large inflows into Crowdnode since the start of this year and proves to me the value of this service, so I support this proposal.
2 points,1 year ago
You have my support.

Since Dash Core v18 is about to hit Dash Mainnet, pls keep an eye on its upcoming release and upgrade your hosted masternodes in a timely manner.